Select your language

A.M. GORKY INSTITUTE OF WORLD LITERATURE
OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

Literature of the Americas

JOURNAL OF LITERARY HISTORY

Povarskaya St., 25A, bld. 1,, 121069 Moscow, Russia

Tel. +7 10 495 690-50-30

editor@litda.ru,  literaturа.da@gmail.com

JATS XML:

XML

BibTEX:

BIB

Research Information Systems Citation Format:

RIS

  • Issue:

    №17 2024

  • Received: 07.09.2024
  • Approved after reviewing: 16.10.2024
  • Date of publication: 25.12.2024
  • УДК / UDK: 821.111(73).0
  • Publication Type: Research Article
  • DOI:

    https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2024-17-90-116

  • EDN:

    https://elibrary.ru/BBUGRC

  • Author: Dmitry D. Nikolaev
  • About the author:

    Dmitry D. Nikolaev, Doctor Hab. in Philology, Leading Researcher, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Povarskaya st. 25A, bld. 1, 121069 Moscow, Russia.

    ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8449-4682  

    E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

  • Abstract:

    The article examines the theoretical problem, the “limit” of the fantastic in literature using the example of the works of American writers Ray Cummings, Miles J. Breuer, A.J. Deutsch, Martin Gardner, Robert Heinlein. The writer cannot create in the text the image of a fantastic space as a phenomenon with new characteristics that are impossible in reality. The image created in the author's imagination is not transmitted to readers using the means of representation available in literature, and the main reason for this is the stability of our spatial perception based on almost limitless possibilities of the non-fantastic space in which we exist. In Ray Cummings' novel Into the Fourth Dimension (1927), the principle of depicting a “different” space in literature is formulated: “We must cling to the realities of our world. There are no other words — no other conceptions — with which we can think these unthought things”. As a result, the “other” world is either described in the text in parameters of the world familiar to readers, as is stated by Cummings, or it is not depicted at all, even being an important element for the plot, as, for example, in fantastic stories on the topic of topology. The impossibility to depict such a “different” world does not exclude the fixation on its essence, but the pictorial space in literature remains stable. Without a visual “hint”, the reader’s consciousness cannot follow beyond the spatially possible model, but in visual arts this barrier existing in literature is removed.

  • Keywords: science fiction, Ray Cummings, Miles J. Breuer, A.J. Deutsch, Martin Gardner, Robert Heinlein poetics, Fourth Dimensional story, Fantasia Mathematica.
  • For citation:

    Nikolaev, Dmitry. “Space as the ‘Limit’ of the Fantastic in Literature: the Impossibility of Overcoming the Possible.” Literature of the Americas, no. 17 (2024): 90–116. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2024-17-90-116 

  • References:

    Attebery 2003 — Attebery, Brian. “The Magazine Era: 1926–1960.” In: The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction, edited by Edward James, Farah Mendlesohn, 32–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

    La novellisation 2004 — La novellisation: du film au roman / Novelization: From Film to Novel. Edited by Jan Baetens and Marc Lits. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2004.

    Bleiler 1990 — Bleiler, Everett F. Science-Fiction: The Early Years: A Full Description of More Than 3,000 Science-Fiction Stories from Earliest Times to the

    Appearance of the Genre Magazines in 1930. With Author, Title, and Motif Indexes. Kent (OH): Kent State University Press, 1990.

    Adaptations 2022 — Adaptations: Critical and Primary Sources. Edited by Deborah Cartmell and Imelda Whelehan. Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.

    L’adaptation 2004 — L’adaptation cinématographique et littéraire. Edited by Jeanne-Marie Clerc and Monique Carcaud-Macaire. Paris: Klincksieck, 2004.

    Gomel 2014 — Gomel, Elana. Narrative Space and Time: Representing Impossible Topologies in Literature. New York; London: Routledge, 2014.