<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  DOMDocument::createElement(): unterminated entity reference  context=clcweb in <b>/home/host1492362/litda.ru/htdocs/www/templates/cassiopeia_litda/html/com_content/article/file_xml.php</b> on line <b>124</b><br />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Literature of the Americas</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Literature of the Americas</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="print">2541-7894</issn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2542-243X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2024-17-51-66</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Wilson 1. Wilson 2: Observation on a Poe Scholars’ Obsession</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group/>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2024</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>The paper offers a new interpretation of one of the most famous ambiguous doppelganger pieces in world literature, E.A. Poe’s “William Wilson” (1839) the inconsistencies of which are notorious. Those are generally attributed to Poe’s “unreliable narrator.” Poe’s tale is set aside in the article with another, equally well-known doppelganger text, to “The Jolly Corner” (1901) by Henry James. The comparative study aims at highlighting the difference in the two writers’ approaches to building up ambiguity and, consequently, the difference in the reader’s reception of these texts. The numerous explanations of “William Wilson,” previously suggested in Poe’s scholarship, — as a moralizing parable, a study in psychopathology, a story of twins, a dream narrative, etc. — tend to ignore the inconsistences. Paradoxically, the tale presents a special challenge to Poe scholars rather than to the ‘naïve’ readership. Knowing his aesthetic theory of the “unity of effect,” one cannot help but suspect that all the paradoxes of “William Wilson,” its carefully placed logical traps were predetermined. The paper employs the instruments of Gestalt-psychology and methods of cognitive literary criticism to provide a new reading of Poe's novella as a case-study of cognitive dissonance. In such an interpretation, the inconsistencies of “William Wilson” turn out to be paradoxically effective.&#13;
&nbsp;</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Bate 1998 — Bate, Nancy Berkowitz. “I Think, but Am Not: The Nightmare of William Wilson.” Poe Studies 31, no. 1–2 (1998): 1–53.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Baumbach 2015 — Baumbach, Sibylle. Literature and Fascination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation/>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Cave 2016 — Cave, Terence. Thinking with Literature: Towards a Cognitive Criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Dennett 1981 — Dennett, Daniel. “Are Dreams Experiences?” In: Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology, edited by Daniel C. Dennett, 129–148. Harvester Press, 1981.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Festinger 1957 — Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Golovacheva 2024 — Golovacheva, Irina V. “Amerikanskii dvoinik / amerikanskii psikhopat v tvorcheskom tupike” [“American Double / American Psycho and the Writer’s Block”]. Literatura dvukh Amerik, no. 16 (2024): 147–168. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Golovacheva 2021 — Golovacheva, Irina. “From Poe to James via Dostoevsky: Doppelgangers in American and Russian Short Story.” In: Connection and Influence in the Russian and American Short Story, edited by Jeff Birkenstein and Robert Hauthart, 35–46. Lanham, (Maryland): Lexington Books, 2021.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Golovacheva 2018 — Golovacheva, Irina. “In Search of the Doppelganger: Homecoming from Exile.” In: European Writers in Exile, edited by Robert C. Hauhart and Jeff Birkenstein, 169–185. Lanham, (Maryland): Lexington Books, 2018.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Golovacheva, Udalova 2020 — Golovacheva, Irina V., Udalova, Svetlana. Iu. “O retransliatsii dvoistvennosti: k novym pere-perevodam dvukh novell Edgara Po” [“Retranslating Ambiguity: on the New Translations of Two Tales by E.A. Poe”]. Literatura dvukh Amerik, no. 8 (2020): 435–462. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Hoffman 1972 — Hoffman, Daniel. Poe Poe Poe Poe Poe Poe Poe. Garden City (N.Y.): Doubleday, 1972.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kukkonen 2017 — Kukkonen, Karin. “Fantastic Cognition.” In: Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues between Literature and Cognition, edited by Michael</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Burke and Emily T. Troscianko, 151–168. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Langmade 2012 — Langmade, Lynn. “The Wilson Duplex: Corporatism and the Problem of Singleton Reading in Poe’s ‘William Wilson,’ (or Why Can’t You See Twins?)” Poe Studies: History, Theory, Interpretation, no. 45, (October 2012): 5–39.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Moores 2006 — Moores, D.J. “‘Oh Gigantic Paradox’: Poe's ‘William Wilson’ and the Jungian Self.” The Edgar Allan Poe Review 7, no. 1 (2006): 31–48.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Osipova 2004 — Osipova, Elvira F. Zagadki Edgara Po. Issledovaniia i kommentarii [The Puzzles of Edgar Allan Poe: Studies and Commentaries]. St. Petersburg: Filologicheskii fakul'tet SpbGU Publ., 2004. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Penrose, Penrose 1958 — Penrose, Lionel, and Roger Penrose. “Impossible Objects: A Special Type of Visual Illusion.” British Journal of Psychology, no. 49 (1958): 31–33.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Petrovsky 2010 — Petrovsky, Vadim A. “Sushchestvuet li Ia — sub'ekt poznaniia?” [“Does ‘I’ Exist as Subject of Cognition, Will and Feelings?”]. Metodologiia i istoriia psikhologii, no. 1 (2010): 136–148. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Petrovsky 2023 — Petrovsky, Vadim A. “O statuse ‘Ia’ v kul'turnodeiatel'nostnom diskurse” [“The ‘I’ Status in the Cultural and Activity Discourse”]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaia psikhologiia 19, no. 1 (2023): 35–40. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Prorokova 2019 — Prorokova, Tatiana. “The Doppelganger, Psychology, and Poe.” In: Psychology in Edgar Allan Poe, edited by Gerardo Del Guercio, 10–120. Berlin: Logos Verlag, 2019.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rimmon-Kenan 1977 — Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. The Concept of Ambiguity: The Example of James. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1977.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Savoy 2013 — Savoy, Eric. “The Narrative Poetics of La Reprise.” In Henry James and the Poetics of Duplicity, edited by Dennis Tredy, Annick Duperray and Adrian Harding, 103–110. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, 2013.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sullivan 1976 — Sullivan, Ruth. “Wilson's Double.” Studies in Romanticism 15, no. 2 (1976): 253–263.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness 2015 — Unreliable Narration and Trustworthiness: Intermedial and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Edited by Vera Nünning. Berlin, München, Boston: De Gruyter, 2015.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Urakova 2009 —Urakova, Alexandra. Poetika tela v rasskazakh Edgara Po [The Poetics of the Body in Edgar Allan Poe's Short Stories]. Moscow: IWL RAS Publ., 2009. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Van Krieken 2018 — Van Krieken, Kobie. “Ambiguous Perspective in Narrative Discourse: Effects of Viewpoint Markers and Verb Tense on Readers’ Interpretation of Represented Perceptions.” Discourse Processes 55, no. 8 (2018): 771–786.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Walsh 2010 — Walsh, Richard. “Dreaming and Narrative Theory.” In: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Narrative Acts: Cognitive Approaches to Literature and Culture, edited by Frederick Luis Aldama, 141–158. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2010.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Wanlin 2018 —Wanlin, Li. “Ambiguity as Aesthetic Strategy: Edgar Allan Poe's Ambitions for the American Short Story.” Journal of Narrative Theory 48, no. 2 (2018): 164–193.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
