<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Literature of the Americas</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Literature of the Americas</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="print">2541-7894</issn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2542-243X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2026-20-274-295</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Review Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Pamphlets and the Public Sphere in the American Revolution: The Case of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group/>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>This article examines Thomas Paine’s seminal pamphlet, Common Sense (1776), as a defining text of political communication during the American Revolution. It analyzes the broader role of eighteenth-century pamphleteering in shaping a vibrant public sphere and disseminating revolutionary ideas throughout the North American colonies. Far from serving merely as tools of political propaganda, these pamphlets offered a vital space for forging new models of political thought, rooted in the principles of popular sovereignty, natural rights, and republican governance. The study explores the pamphlet’s distinctive style, deliberately crafted to resonate with a wide audience, and the rhetorical and discursive strategies Paine employed. These strategies allowed him to frame the separation from Great Britain not as a radical leap, but as a logically self-evident and politically imperative step. Methodologically, the research adopts a discursive approach informed by the theoretical framework of hegemony and “empty signifiers” developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe. This analytical lens positions Common Sense as a powerful act of political signification, actively working to construct a new symbolic order. Paine’s text strategically redefines the key categories of the revolutionary era, that is, “the people,” “liberty,” and “law.” The article demonstrates how these concepts function as “empty signifiers,” capable of uniting disparate social and political grievances into a cohesive discursive front, all directed toward legitimizing the independence of the colonies. Finally, by comparing the rhetoric of Common Sense with that of the Declaration of Independence, the article traces the transformation of revolutionary discourse. It shows how Paine’s passionate, mobilizing language evolved into the formal, institutional, and legal language of nation-building, marking the journey from revolutionary call to political foundation.</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Adams 1968 — Adams, Thomas R. “The British Pamphlet Press and the American Controversy, 1764–1783.” Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society 78, no. 1 (1968): 33–51.Alentieva, Filimonova 2021 — Alentieva, Tatiana V., and Maria A. Filimonova. Prosvetitel’skie idei i revoliutsionnyi protsess v Severnoi Amerike [Enlightenment Ideas and the Revolutionary Process in North America]. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia Publ., 2021. (In Russ.)Apteker 1970 — Aptheker, Herbert. O prirode demokratii, svobody i revoliutsii [On the Nature of Democracy, Freedom and Revolution]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1970. (In Russ.)Bailyn 2010 — Bailyn, Bernard. Ideologicheskiye istoki Amerikanskoy revolyutsii [The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 2010. (In Russ.)Berthold 1938 — Berthold, S.M. Thomas Paine, America’s First Liberal. Boston, MA, 1938.Bolkhovitinov 1980 — Bolkhovitinov, Nikolay N. SShA: Problemy istorii i sovremennaia istoriografiia [USA: Problems of History and Contemporary Historiography]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1980. (In Russ.)Bolkhovitinov 2001 — Bolkhovitinov, Nikolay N. “Velikie dokumenty Amerikanskoi revoliutsii: Vzgliad iz Rossii” [“The Great Documents of the American Revolution: A View from Russia”]. In Amerikanskaia tsivilizatsiia kak istoricheskiifenomen. Vospriiatie SShA v amerikanskoi, zapadnoevropeiskoi i russkoi obshchestvennoi mysli [American Civilization as a Historical Phenomenon. Perception of the USA in American, Western European and Russian Social Thought], edited by N.N. Bolkhovitinov, 449–462. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2001. (In Russ.)Bourne 1887 — Bourne, Henry Richard Fox. English Newspapers: Chapters in the History of Journalism, 2 vols., vol. 1. London, 1887.Brown 1989 — Brown, Richard D. Knowledge is Power: The Diffusion of Information in Early America, 1700–1865. New York, 1989.Calkin 1940 — Calkin, Homer L. “Pamphlets and Public Opinion During the American Revolution.” The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 64, no. 1 (1940): 22–42.Conway 1892 — Conway, Moncure Daniel. The Life of Thomas Paine with a History of His Literary, Political and Religious Career in America, France, and England, vol. 1. New York, 1892.De Pauw 1966 — De Pauw, Linda Grant. The Eleventh Pillar. New York State and the Federal Constitution. Ithaca, NY, 1966.Edgar 2015 — Edgar, Caitlin. “Brewing Identity: The Tavern’s Imprint on the American Revolution.” Undergraduate Theses, Providence College, 2015.Filimonova 2015 — Filimonova, Maria A. “Imperia bez metropolii: proekty reformirovania Britanskoi imperii v Amerike nakanune Voiny za nezavisimost” [“Empire Without a Metropolis: Projects of Reforming the British Empire in America on the Eve of the War for Independence”]. In Britania: istoriya, kul’tura, obrazovanie: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, 1–2 oktyabria 2015 g. [Britain: History, Culture, Education: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, October 1–2, 2015], 162–164. Yaroslavl’: YaGPU Publ., 2015. (In Russ.) Foner 1976 — Foner, Eric. Tom Paine and Revolutionary America. New York, 1976.Grave 1960 — Grave, Selwyn A. The Scottish Philosophy of Common Sense. Oxford, 1960.Habermas 2017 — Habermas, Jürgen. Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoi sfery: issledovanie otnositel’no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshchestva [The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society]. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publ., 2017. (In Russ.)Higham 2018 — Higham, Danielle. “Beyond Propaganda: Positioning Thomas Paine’s Common Sense in the Literature of Revolution.” Honors thesis, Brigham Young University, 2018.Horn Melton 2001 — Horn Melton, James van. The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe. Cambridge, 2001.Istoriia literatury SShA 1997 — Istoriia literatury SShA [History of USA Literature], 6 vols., vol. 1. Moscow: Nasledie Publ., 1997. (In Russ.)Keane 1995 — Keane, John. Tom Paine: A Political Life. Boston et al., 1995.Kobre 1970 — Kobre, Sidney. The Foundations of American Journalism. Westport, CT., 1970.Korotkova 2013 — Korotkova, Svetlana A. “Patsifizm kvakerov i sobytiia vFiladel’fii v 1776–1778 gg.” [“Quaker Pacifism and Events in Philadelphia in 1776–1778”]. In Amerikanistika: aktual’nye podkhody i sovremennye issledovaniia [American Studies: Current Approaches and Modern Research], iss. 5, 305–322. Kursk: Kursk State Univ. Publ., 2013. (In Russ.)Laclau 1996 — Laclau, Ernesto. “Why do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?” In Emancipation(s), 36–46. London; New York, 1996.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
