<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  DOMDocument::createElement(): unterminated entity reference  Society 1/3 (1979): 297–311.Ray 1985 — Ray, Robert Beverley. A Certain Tendency of the Hollywood Cinema, 1930–1980. Princeton, 1985.Rothmayer 2002 — Rothmayer, Michael. “The Drama of Life Unfolding: The Life and Work of Steve Tesich.” PhD diss., University of Nebraska, 2002.Segaloff 2011 — Segaloff, Nat. Arthur Penn: American Director. Lexington, 2011.Stempel 2000 — Stempel, Tom. Framework: A History of Screenwriting in the American Film. Syracuse, 2000.Šoškić 2017 — Šoškić, Radoje. “The Closing of the American Mind: On the Open Road by Steve Tesich and Resurrection Blues by Arthur Miller.” PhD diss., Kosovska Mitrovica, 2017 (unpublished).Taylor 2007 — Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA, 2007. in <b>/home/host1492362/litda.ru/htdocs/www/templates/cassiopeia_litda/html/com_content/article/file_xml.php</b> on line <b>124</b><br />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Literature of the Americas</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Literature of the Americas</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="print">2541-7894</issn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2542-243X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2026-20-240-273</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>From Myth to Simulacrum: Steve Tesich’s Vision of America</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group/>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>In the closing decades of the twentieth century, Steve Tesich emerged in Hollywood as a distinctive authorial presence, introducing a constellation of themes articulated through the ostensibly familiar framework of the classical narrative form. Within the boundaries of mainstream cinematic production, Tesich — himself a Yugoslav émigré — carved out a singular creative space in which personal memory, social reflection, and mythic imagination converge. His work constructs a profoundly nostalgic vision of America, reanimating a social landscape that had, by the late 1970s, grown inert under the weight of disillusionment and cultural fatigue. Animated by the idealism that once drew him toward his adopted homeland, Tesich’s films nonetheless register the melancholy of exile — the dissonance between the immigrant’s dream of America and the fragmented reality that unfolds before him. His cinematic expression, delicately poised between comedy and critique, is marked by a tone of humane irony and by characterizations that transcend mere typology, inviting philosophical inquiry into the nature of belonging, aspiration, and loss. Through the gentle humor that masks a deeper social consciousness, Tesich interrogates the moral and emotional underpinnings of the American Dream, exposing the subtle tensions between personal authenticity and collective myth. Among his six realized screenplays, Breaking Away and Four Friends stand as the most emblematic articulations of Tesich’s artistic and ethical vision. This paper examines these works not only as cultural texts inscribed within the conventions of the entertainment industry, but also as acts of introspection that destabilize those very conventions — revealing cinema’s potential to negotiate the fragile boundary between individual experience and national ideology.</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation/>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
