Issue:

№ 13 2022

УДК / UDK: 821.111.0
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2022-13-109-133

EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/VQWRJP 

Author: Giuliana Ferreccio
About the author:

Giuliana Ferreccio, PhD., Former Professor, Turin University, Department of Humanities, 8 Via Verdi, Turin, 10124, Italy.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7440-1665

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Abstract:

“Words strain, / Crack and sometimes break, … will not stay in place, / Will not staystill” (Burnt Norton V). Using words and not being used by them is rare to Eliot’s thought tormented figures, from his drama Sweeney Agonistes to Four Quartets. The struggle with words is a constant trait of Eliot’s poetry, besides being common among modernists all over Europe. His drama’s broken syntax mirrors the clashing mixture of Aeschylean tragedy, Aristophanic comedy, and the popular culture of music-hall, cabaret, and jazz, which make up the play. As a result, the play brings forth a modernistic defamiliarizing, and metatheatrical effect, by breaking up the linear rapport between action and word, actor and gesture, sign and signified. Poetic drama or unfinished poem, Sweeney Agonistes has been recently revalued (Chinitz, Buttram, Daniel, Cuda), but in its daring avant-garde experimentalism (de Villiers), still eludes interpretations, mainly because of the far from clear reason why Eliot neither finished it nor included it in his theatrical production. If, however, we place the play in the context of various dramatic theories and plays of the time, we may read its incongruities, and disjunctions between words and things, as a one of the modernistic traits that were widely discussed at the time, among others, by Walter Benjamin in The Origin of the German Trauerspiel. Benjamin’s new way of looking at allegory, stressing its self-referential import, may help us find one more key to the revolutionary direction Eliot had envisaged in his non-dramatic tragedy. As Eliot himself said of Seneca: “the drama is all in the word and the word has no further reality behind it”. Although a link between Eliot’s conservative modernism and Benjamin’s messianism would seem unlikely, recent studies have highlighted some of their common ground (Neilson, Lehman). In order to account for the play’s disjunctions and metatheatrical language, I will dwell on Eliot’s notion of the dissociation of sensibility (1920–1927) comparing it to Benjamin’s allegorical perception, or “the falling apart of modern man”.

Keywords: Eliot, Sweeney Agonistes, Benjamin, Modernism, drama, referentiality.
For citation:

Ferreccio, Giuliana. “Modernist Drama and Referentiality: T.S. Eliot’s Sweeney Agonistes and Walter Benjamin’s Trauerspiel.” Literature of the Americas, no. 13 (2022): 109–133. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2022-13-109-133 

References:

Anderson, Iversen 2018 — Anderson, Miranda and Stefan Iversen. “Immersion and Defamiliarization: Experiencing Literature and World.” Poetics Today, vol. XXXIX, no. 3 (2018): 569–595.

Beckett 2009 — Beckett, Samuel. The Letters of Samuel Beckett 1929–1940. Vol. 1, edited by Martha Dow Fehsenfeld, Lois More Overbeck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Benjamin 1998 — Benjamin, Walter. The Origin of German Tragic Drama (1928). Translated by George Osborne. London: Verso, 1998.

Benjamin 1999 — Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project. Edited and Translated by Howard Jennings, Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999.

Benjamin 2004–2006 — Benjamin, Walter. Selected Writings, in 4 vols. Edited by Marcus Bullock, Howard Eiland, Michael W. Jennings, Gary Smith. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2004–2006.

Benjamin 2019 — Benjamin, Walter. The Origin of the German Trauerspiel. Translated by Howard Eiland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.

Brooker 2018 — Brooker, Jewel Spears. T.S. Eliot’s Dialectical Imagination. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.

Buttram 2014 — Buttram, Christine. “Sweeney Agonistes: A Sensational Snarl.” In A Companion to T.S. Eliot, edited by David E. Chinitz, 179–190. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2014.

Caygill 2004 — Caygill, Howard. “Walter Benjamin’s Concept of Cultural History.” In The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin, edited by David S. Ferris. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Cermatori 2021 — Cermatori, Joseph. Baroque Modernity. An Aesthetics of Theater. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2021.

Chinitz 1995 — Chinitz, David E. T.S. Eliot and the Cultural Divide. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Coyle 2014 — Coyle, Michael. “‛Fishing, With the Arid Plain Behind Me’: Difficulty, Deferral and Form in The Waste Land.” In A Companion to T.S. Eliot, edited by David E. Chinitz, 157–167. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2014.

Crawford 2022 — Crawford, Robert. Eliot After The Waste Land. London: Jonathan Cape, 2022.

Cuda 2017 — Cuda, Anthony. “‛A Precise Way of Thinking and Feeling’: Eliot and Verse Drama.” In The New Cambridge Companion to T.S. Eliot, edited by Jason Harding, 116–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Daniel 2011 — Daniel, Julia. “‛Or it Might Be You’: Audiences In and Of T.S. Eliot’s Sweeney Agonistes.Modern Drama, vol. LIV, no. 4 (Winter 2011): 435–454.

De Villiers 2012 — De Villiers, Rick. “‛Of the Same Species’: T.S. Eliot’s Sweeney Agonistes and Samuel Beckett’s Waiting For Godot.” English Studies in Africa, vol. LV, no. 2 (2012): 18–28.

De Villiers 2021 — De Villiers, Rick. Eliot and Beckett’s Low Modernism: Humility and Humiliation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021.

Eliot 1993 — Eliot, T.S. The Varieties of Metaphysical Poetry. Edited by Ronald Schuchard. London: Faber and Faber, 1993.

Eliot 2009 — Eliot, T.S. The Letters of T.S. Eliot. Vol. I–II. Edited by Valerie Eliot, Hugh Houghton. London: Faber and Faber, 2009.

Eliot 2014, I — Eliot, T.S. The Complete Prose of T.S. Eliot: The Critical Edition. Edited by Ronald Schuchard, Jewel Spears Brooker. Vol. I: Apprentice Years, 1905–1918. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; Digital Edition, 2014.

Eliot 2014, II — Eliot, T.S The Complete Prose of T.S. Eliot: The Critical Edition. Vol. II: The Perfect Critic, 1919-1926. Edited by Anthony Cuda, Ronald Schuchard. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; Digital Edition, 2014.

Eliot 2015 — Eliot, T.S. The Poems of T.S. Eliot. Vol. I. Edited by Christopher Ricks, Jim McCue. London: Faber and Faber, 2015.

Eliot 2017 — Eliot, T.S. The Complete Prose of T.S. Eliot: The Critical Edition. Edited by Iman Javadi, Ronald Schuchard, Jaymie Stayer. Vol. V: Tradition and Orthodoxy, 1934-1939. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; Digital Edition, 2017.

Glück 1999 — Glück, Louise. Proofs and Theories. Manchester: Carcanet, 1999.

Grove 1994 — Grove, Robin. “Pereira and After: The Cures of Eliot’s Theater”. In The Cambridge Companion to T.S. Eliot, edited by A. David Moody, 158–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Gurr 2015 — Gurr, Jens Martin. “The Modernist Poetics of Urban Memory and the Structural Analogies Between ‛City’ and ‛Text’: The Waste Land and Benjamin’s Arcades Project.” In Recovery and Transgression: Memory in American Poetry, edited by Kornelia Freitag, 21–37. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2015.

Lehman 2016 — Lehman, Robert S. Impossible Modernism: T.S. Eliot, Walter Benjamin, and the Critique of Historical Reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2016.

Lehmann 2006 — Lehmann, Hans-Thies. Postdramatic Theatre (1999). Translated by Karen Jürs-Munby. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006. 

Levenson 2015 — Levenson, Michael. “Form, Voice, and the Avant-Garde.” In The Cambridge Companion to The Waste Land, edited by Garbrielle McIntire, 87–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

Malamud 1992 — Malamud, Randy. T.S. Eliot’s Drama. New York: Greenwood Press, 1992.

Neilson 2007 — Neilson, Brett. “At the Frontiers of Metaphysics: Time and History in T.S. Eliot and Walter Benjamin.” In T.S. Eliot and the Concept of Tradition, edited by Giovanni Cianci, Jason Harding, 201–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Schmitt 1997 — Schmitt, Natalie Crohn. “Old Times: Pinter’s Meditation on Sweeney Agonistes.” Cycnos, vol. XIV, no. 1 (1997). https://epi-revel.univ-cotedazur.fr/cycnos/536.pdf 

Schuchard 1999 — Schuchard, Ronald. Eliot’s Dark Angel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Sidnell 1984 — Sidnell, Michael. Dances of Death: The Group Theatre of London in the Thirties. London: Faber and Faber, 1984.

Smith 1963 — Smith, Carol H. T.S. Eliot’s Dramatic Theory and Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.

Spanos 1970 — Spanos, William V. “‛Wanna Go Home Baby?’: Sweeney Agonistes as Drama of the Absurd.” Modern Language Association, vol. LXXXV, no. 1 (1970): 8–20.

The Living Theatre 1952 — The Living Theatre: Stein Picasso, Eliot [with John Cage poetry]. New York: The Living Theatre, 1952.

Waugh 2011 — Waugh, Patricia. “Legacies: from Literary Criticism to Literary Theory.” In Eliot in Context, edited by Jason Harding, 381–394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Woolf 1999 — Woolf, Virginia. The Diary of Virginia Woolf. Vol. II, 1920–1924. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1999.