Issue:

№16 2024

УДК / UDK: 821.111(73).0
Publication Type: Research Article
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2024-16-291-316

EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/HHOHAA

Author: Natalia V. Morzhenkova
About the author:

Natalia V. Morzhenkova, Doctor Hab. In Philology, Professor of Huaqiao University (HQU), Chenghua North Rd. No.269, Quanzhou, Fujian, China 362021.

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8415-3965 

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 

Abstract:

Analyzing Gertrude Stein's early short story “The Good Anna”, included in the trilogy Three Lives (1909), the article examines the dialogical process of the formation of the author's poetics at the intersection of various discourses dealing with the concept of habituality. Written under the influence of the ideas of W. James and the aesthetic principles of G. Flaubert and P. Cézanne, the story can be read as a “space” within which scientific and aesthetic representation of ordinary interact. I argue that we can treat this juxtapositions of names (Stein, James, Flaubert and Cézanne), not as a result of individual circumstances and personal preferences, but as a manилиifestation of certain zeitgeist. Particular attention is paid to the comparative reading of “The Good Anna” as created under the powerful influence of Flaubert’s “A Simple Heart.” On the one hand, the recognition of Flaubert's influence on the writer is commonplace in Stein scholarship. On the other hand, it has not attracted close attention, paradoxically remaining a frequently mentioned but underexplored issue. The article proves that through her dialogue with Flaubert, Stein develops a special mode of defamiliarization, revealing the complex relationship between the extraliterary automatically emerging speech of everydayness and the literary experimental discourse. The discussion of Flaubert's influence on Stein's development as a modernist author implies, in principle, the need to look at this dialogue from a broader perspective, without reducing it to a special case of apprenticeship with the greats and without forgetting the two-way direction of this contact of texts.

Keywords: Gertrude Stein, Gustave Flaubert, William James, Paul Cézanne, defamiliarization, the trivial as a subject of aesthetic reflection, American modernism.
For citation:

Morzhenkova, Natalia. “The Making of an Avant-garde Artist: G. Stein in Dialogue with W. James, G. Flaubert and P. Cézanne.” Literature of the Americas, no. 16 (2024): 291–316. https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2024-16-291-316 

References:

Athanassoglou-Kallmyer 1990 — Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, Nina. “An Artistic and Political Manifesto for Cezanne.” The Art Bulletin 72, no. 3 (September 1990): 482–492.

Bourdieu 1992 — Bourdieu, Pierre. Les Règles de l'art. Genèse et structure du champ littéraire. Paris: Seuil, 1992.

Dictionary 2001 — Dictionary of Artists' Models. Edited by J.B. Jiminez. London, Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2001.

Farland 2004 — Farland, Maria. “Gertrude Stein's Brain Work.” American Literature 76, no. 1 (March 2004): 117–148.

Felman 1986 — Felman, Shoshana. “Modernity of the Commonplace.” In Critical Essays on Gustave Flaubert, edited by L. M. Porter, 29–48. Boston: Hall, 1986.

Fried 2022 — Fried, Michael. French Suite: A Book of Essays. London: Reaktion Books, 2022.

Gott 2013 — Gott, Henry Michael. Ascetic Modernism in the Work of T S Eliot and Gustave Flaubert. London, New York: Routledge, 2013

Haselstein 2009 — Haselstein, Ulla. “A New Kind of Realism: Flaubert's Trois Contes and Stein's Three Lives.” Comparative Literature 61, no. 4 (Fall 2009): 388–399.

Hubert 1989 — Hubert, Renée Riese. Gertrude Stein and the Making of Frenchmen.” SubStance 18, no. 2, issue 59, (1989): 71–92.

Kinney 1977 — Kinney, F. Arthur. “Faulkner and Flaubert.” Journal of Modern Literature 6, no. 2 (April 1977): 222−247.

Liesl 2009 — Liesl, Olson. Modernism and the Ordinary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Meyer 2001— Meyer, Steven. Irresistible Dictation: Gertrude Stein and the Correlations of Writing and Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.

Moore 2024 — Moore, Sam. “Where to Start with: Gertrude Stein.” The Guardian (February 3, 2024). https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/feb/03/where-to-start-with-gertrude-stein

Porter 2001 — Porter, M. Laurence. A Gustave Flaubert Encyclopedia. Greenwood: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2001.

Reid 1993 — Reid, H. James. Narration and Description in the French Realist Novel. The Temporality of Lying and Forgetting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Rewald 1986 — Rewald, John. Cézanne: A Biography. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1986.

Richardson 2007 — Richardson D. Robert. William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.

Strickland 1967 — Strickland, G. R. “Flaubert, Ezra Pound and T. S. Eliot.” The Cambridge Quarterly 2, no. 3 (July 1967): 242–263

Understanding 2017 — Understanding James, Understanding Modernism. Edited by David H. Evans. New York: Bloomsbury, 2017

Venediktova 2001 — Venediktova, Tat'iana D. “Sekret sredinnogo mira: kul`turnaia funkciia realizma XIX v.” [“The Secret of the Middle World: The Cultural Function of Nineteenth-Century Realism”]. In Zarubezhnaya Literatura Vtorogo Ty`syacheletiya, 1000–2000. [Foreign Literature of the Second Millennium, 1000–2000], 186–220. Moscow: Vysshaia shkola Publ., 2001: 2001. (In Russ.)

Will 2000 — Will, Barbara. Modernism, and the Problem of “Genius.” Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.