Issue:

№ 9 2020

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2020-9-174-194

УДК / UDK: 82(091)
About the author:

Andrei A. Gornykh (Doctor Hab. of Philosophy, professor, European Humanities University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract: The article examines how the social-critical vision of modern society stems from the key notions of Kenneth Burke's conception of “symbolic action”. The bridge between literary criticism and Burke's socio-anthropological constructions is the concept of motive. An authentic source of motives for human action is a metaphor that gives an image that is simultaneously poetic, imaginary and dynamic, moving (in the form of “third term” of the metaphor). The metaphor reveals unexpected, but essential unity of dissimilar things. And in this sense it serves as a model of inter-subjective relations. Group cohesion can be understood as an “extended metaphor” in which all group members have a common “third term”. Thus, Burke brings the fields of anthropology and poetics closer together. A metaphor is a relationship in which the elements do not absorb each other, but reveal the essence of each other, sublate their partiality, contingency, that is make up a collective form. This is the “paradox of substance”. The commonality of a tribe is not an abstraction that arises “after” individuals, but exists in the form of a generic substance in the individuals themselves. This defines the dialectic of identification: the individual coincides with himself by mediation of not-himself (some external “character”). The paradox of substance places symbolic actions in the general field of “symbolic communication,” in which the word is not only an external instrument, but an internal quality of individuals. Poetic imagery is the substance of the social. Metaphor in this capacity is contrasted with money, which, displacing metaphor as a principle of social coherence, undermines truly human motives (utilitarianism instead of communal poetics).
Keywords: Kenneth Burke, symbol, motive, metaphor, money, utopia, communication, social cohesion.
References:

Abbott, Don. “Marxist Influences on the Rhetorical Theory of Kenneth Burke.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 7:4 (Fall 1974): 217–233.

Baudrillard, Jean. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert' [Symbolic Exchange and Death]. Moscow: Dobrosvet Publ., 2000. (In Russ.)

Burke in the Archives: Using the Past to Transform the Future of Burkean Studies, eds. Dana Anderson, Jessica Enoch. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2013.

Burke, Kenneth. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.

Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966.

Burke, Kenneth. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.

Burke, Kenneth. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of  Purpose.  New York: New Republic, 1935.

Burke, Kenneth. The Philosophy of Literary Form: Studies in Symbolic Action. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1973.

Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.

Burke, Kenneth. “Symbol and Association.” Hudson Review 9 (1956): 212–225.

Bygrave, Stephen. Kenneth Burke: Rhetoric and Ideology. London; New York: Routledge, 1993.

Heath, Robert L. Realism and Relativism: A Perspective on Kenneth Burke. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1986.

Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981.

Jameson, Fredric. “Symbolic Inference; or, Kenneth Burke and Ideological Analysis.” The Ideologies of Theory. London, New York: Verso, 2008: 144–161.

Wess, Robert. Kenneth Burke. Rhetoric, Subjectivity, Postmodernism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

Wolin, Ross. The Rhetorical Imagination of Kenneth Burke. Studies in Rheto- ric/Communication. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2001.