Issue:

№ 9 2020

УДК / UDK: 82(091)
DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22455/2541-7894-2020-9-106-132

Author: Steven Mailloux
About the author:

Steven Mailloux (PhD, Emeritus President’s Professor of Rhetoric, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles; Emeritus Professor of English and Comparative Literature, University of California, Irvine; California, USA)

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Abstract:

Kenneth Burke’s logology is a way of thinking about how to understand the use of language—what he calls “symbolic action”—and how to use language to make sense of various human practices, including interpretive acts. This is a dialectic in thought between rhetoric as language-use and interpretation as making-sense. In The Rhetoric of Religion Burke’s theotropic logology uses theology to interpret symbolic action and symbolic action to interpret theology. Burke extends to other interpretive projects this same rhetorical-hermeneutic strategy of analogically translating words from one domain into another, from one meaning into another. This strategy is one way Burke thinks with other authors and their texts. The present essay uses some of Burke’s published and unpublished work to show how he thinks with the Christian Existentialism of Nicholas Berdyaev and Fyodor Dostoevsky, especially on the topic of freedom. In his thinking with Berdyaev, Burke agrees with the Russian theo-philosopher about the importance of freedom. Indeed, the act of freedom, dramatized in Dostoevsky and described by Berdyaev, forms the very center of Burke’s theory of symbolic action, his Dramatism and ultimately his Logology. Freedom is the condition of possibility for human action as opposed to mere motion, and free will is the necessary product of the cycle of terms implicit in the idea of hierarchical order presented in Burke’s The Rhetoric of Religion.

Keywords: Kenneth Burke, Nicholas Berdyaev, Fyodor Dostoevsky, freedom, logology, theology, rhetorical hermeneutics.
References:

Berdiaev, N.A. “Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo. Glavy iz knigi” [“Dostoevsky’s World Concept. Selected Chapters.”] Volga 10 (1988): 146 –165. (In Russ.)

Berdiaev, N.A. Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo [Dostoevsky’s World Concept]Praga: The YMCA PRESS Ltd. Publ., 1923. (In Russ.)

Berdiaev, N.A. O naznachenii cheloveka [The Destination of a Human Being]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 1993. (In Russ.)

Berdiaev, N.A. Tsarstvo Dukha i tsarstvo kesaria [The Realm of Spirit and the Realm of Caesar]. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 1995. (In Russ.)

Bergson, Henri. Tvorcheskaia evoliutsiia [Creative Evolution], transl. V. Flerova. Moscow: TERRA –Knizhnyi klub; KANON-press-Ts Publ., 2001. (In Russ.)

Burke, Kenneth. “Careers Without Careerism.” Kenyon Review 7 (Winter 1945 –46): 162 –66. Rpt. in Equipment for Living: The Literary Reviews of Kenneth Burke, eds. Nathaniel A. Rivers and Ryan P. Weber. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, 2010: 497 –501.

Burke, Kenneth. “Definition of Man.” Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966: 3 –24.

Burke, Kenneth. “A Dramatistic View of the Origins of Language and Postscripts on the Negative.” Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966: 419 –79.

Burke, Kenneth. Equipment for Living: The Literary Reviews of Kenneth Burke, eds. Nathaniel A. Rivers and Ryan P. Weber. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press, 2010.

Burke, Kenneth. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.

Burke, Kenneth. “(Non-Symbolic) Motion/(Symbolic) Action.” Critical Inquiry 4 (Summer 1978): 809 –38.

Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.

Burke, Kenneth. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1970.

Burke, Kenneth. “Terministic Screens.” Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966: 44 –62.

Burke, Kenneth. “What Are the Signs of What? A Theory of ‘Entitlement’.” Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966: 359 –79.

Drong, Leszek. Disciplining the New Pragmatism: Theory, Rhetoric, and the Ends of Literary Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2007.

Herberg, Will. “General Introduction” to Four Existentialist Theologians. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1958: 1–24.

The Long Voyage: Selected Letters of Malcolm Cowley, 1915-1987, ed. Hans Bak. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2014.

Mailloux, Steven. “Sravnenie: pervaia vstrecha, etnotsentrizm i mezhkul'turnaia kommunikatsiia.” [“Making Comparisons: First Contact, Ethnocentrism, and Cross-Cul- tural Communication”], transl. D. Kharitonov. Tsennosti, kanony, tseny: Tekst kak sred- stvo mezhkul'turnogo obmena [Values, Сanons, Prices: Text as a Medium of Exchange]. Materialy VII Fulbraitovskoi gumanitarnoi letnei shkoly [VII Fulbright Summer School in the Humanities Proceedings], ed. Tatiana Venediktova. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo MGU Publ., 2005: 14 –29. (In Russ.)

Mailloux, Steven. “Political Theologies of Sacred Rhetoric.” Responding to the Sacred: An Inquiry into the Limits of Rhetoric, eds. Michael Bernard-Donals and Kyle Jensen. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2021: 77 –98.

Mailloux, Steven. “Rhetoric.” The Bloomsbury Handbook of Literary and Cultur- al Theory, ed. Jeffrey R. Di Leo. London: Bloomsbury, 2019: 102 –111.

Mailloux, Steven. Rhetoric’s Pragmatism: Essays in Rhetorical Hermeneutics. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2017.

Michalson, Carl. “What Is Existentialism?” Christianity and the Existentialists, ed. Carl Michalson. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1956: 1 –22.

Niebuhr, H. Richard. “Sören Kierkegaard.” Christianity and the Existentialists, ed. Carl Michalson. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1956: 23 –42.

Niebuhr, Reinhold. “The Russian Idea.” Religion in Life 18:2 (Spring 1949): 239 –42.

Reception Study: From Literary Theory to Cultural Studies, eds. James L. Machor and Philip Goldstein. New York: Routledge, 2001.

Reconceptualizing American Literary/Cultural Studies: Rhetoric, History, and Politics in the Humanities, ed. William E. Cain. New York: Garland, 1996.

The Selected Correspondence of Kenneth Burke and Malcolm Cowley, 1915 –1981, ed. Paul Jay. New York: Viking, 1988.

Spinka, Matthew. “Nicholas Berdyaev.” Christianity and the Existentialists, ed. Carl Michalson. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1956: 59 –75.